In a move sent to redefine the landscape of Nepal’s public administration, President Ramchandra Paudel has issued a sweeping ordinance resulting in the immediate dismissal of 1,594 political appointees across various state institutions.
The decision, recommended by the Cabinet led by Prime Minister Balendra Shah, marks one of the largest administrative “cleansing” operations in the country’s modern history, aimed at dismantling deeply entrenched patronage networks.
A Total Reset of Public Institutions
The ordinance targets office-bearers and board members who were appointed under previous administrations based on political affiliation rather than merit. The removals span a wide array of critical sectors, including:
-
Academic Institutions: Vice-chancellors and registrars at multiple state universities.
-
Utility Giants: High-level board members at the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) and Nepal Telecom.
-
Development Sector: Heads of various national development funds, commissions, and committees.
-
State-Owned Enterprises: Leadership within dozens of public corporations and regulatory bodies.
Ending the “Partisan Share” Culture
The Prime Minister’s office stated that the move is a necessary step to “reset” the functionality of public institutions. For decades, Nepal’s bureaucracy has been criticized for the Bhagbanda (partisan sharing) system, where political parties distributed lucrative government posts to loyalists.
“Public institutions belong to the citizens, not political parties,” a spokesperson from the Prime Minister’s office noted. “By removing these appointees, we are clearing the path for merit-based recruitment and professional management that focuses on service delivery rather than political agendas.”
Legal and Political Implications
The mass removal has sent shockwaves through the political establishment. Opposition leaders have criticized the move as “authoritarian,” arguing that it undermines institutional memory and could lead to a vacuum in governance. Legal experts are also closely watching for potential court challenges, as many of those removed held fixed-term contracts.
However, the government has signaled that it will quickly move to fill these vacancies through a transparent, open-competition process. New criteria for these roles are expected to prioritize technical expertise and a proven track record over political history.
What Happens Next?
With over 1,500 posts now vacant, the government faces the monumental task of ensuring that essential services—ranging from electricity management to university examinations—remain uninterrupted. A temporary committee of senior civil servants has been formed to oversee these institutions until permanent, merit-based appointments are finalized.